Removal of deposited uranium particles using laser cleaning for metal surfaces
Removal of uranium compound particles such as uranyl nitrate (UO2(NO3)2
6H2O) and uranium dioxide (UO2) on surfaces in the nuclear
industry is of utmost importance. Metal canisters in hot cell complexes and
instrumentation in nuclear fuel production need to be cleaned off from these
particles (Reference 1). Potential applications exists in Pebble Bed Modular
Reactors (PBMR) which are used in South Africa. Uranyl nitrate is the basic
feed material for PBMR fuel production and uranium dioxide is the fissionable
material of the fuel element kernels (Reference
1). Figure 1 shows pebbles used in PBMR.
Figure 1: Pebbles used in PBMR (Reference 2)
Although the funding for PBMR technology has been cut in South Africa (Reference 2), the issue of cleaning uranium particles metal canisters remains a common issue for all types of nuclear reactors.
Loose uranium compounds are much easier to remove as a form of contamination as compared to the contamination that has penetrated into the oxide layers of metal surfaces in a nuclear reactor. However, loose contamination is dangerous because firstly, it can be inhaled by a person and secondly it can be carried by footwear or clothing to another location outside of the restricted areas. Once these particles are inside the body, they pose a radiation hazard and as well as they are considered toxic.
There are many different methods of cleaning these loose particles such as chemical cleaning or water jetting. However, the addition of chemicals or water implies dealing with the secondary waste that is generated. The secondary waste is radioactive and needs to be properly disposed of. This adds to cost of using these cleaning methods and improper disposal of secondary waste could create health hazards or contaminate water supplies.
An alternative method is laser cleaning where a pulsed laser ablates the surface and removed the particles. This method is a dry process and removes all the contamination without the use of a secondary medium (such as water or chemicals). The particles are removed using an extraction system which contains a disposable dry filter such as HEPA filter (Reference 1).
As far as the choice of the laser is concerned, both the surface layer removal and Dry Laser Cleaning (DLC) are more efficient at shorter wavelengths such as in the visible region which could reduce the substrate damage. However, the choice of the laser is dictated by the over all efficiency of cleaning large areas which dictates the use of either a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm, or an industry grade pulsed fiber laser.
Figure 2: Removal of rust by a robot controlled, 100 watt Near-IR fiber laser from a metal pipe
To be considered a clean surface (white area) ,
both the α and β activity need to be considered. In general, α activity is more important than β activity and has a lower maximum activity limit because it
poses a more severe internal hazard. The safe dose for a particles is less than
0.04 Bq/cm2 whereas the safe does for b particles is 10 times higher
and is less than 0.4 Bq/cm2. Several tests were performed on
stainless steel samples covered with either powders of uranyl nitrate or
uranium dioxide. In one set of tests, a fan used as the first pass for cleaning
followed by several laser passes followed by a swipe with smear paper and
finally finished off by washing with water. Figure 3 shows the test done on
Uranium dioxide cleaning using a 0.36 J/cm2 laser fluence.
Figure 3: Laser cleaning of Uranium dioxide using a fan (the first pass), laser (the second, the third and the fourth passes), swipe with smear paper (the fifth pass) and wash with water (the sixth pass) using a 0.36 J/cm2 fluence.
The result in figure 3 shows a low drop in activity when the fan was used as the first pass but 85% of the particles were removed after the laser passes. The cleaning by smear paper and wash with water (5th and 6th passes) showed minor reduction in activity.
4 shows the same test done on cleaning the uranyl nitrate particles using the
same laser fluence of 0.36 J/cm2. Uranyl nitrate layers are in fact
semi-transparent to laser radiation at 1064 nm and therefore they can be
removed at the layer-substrate interface using the process of spallation
(Reference 3). The result shows a low removal using the fan only but a 98% drop
in activity after three laser passes.
Figure 4: Removal of Uranyl nitrate using laser of fluence 0.36 J/cm2. The first pass was the fan only. The following three passes used laser cleaning
For a nuclear decontamination system, it is important to demonstrate that a huge percentage of radioactivity that is removed can be trapped before being redeposited on the surface again. It should also be collected in a form suitable for disposal. For the research referenced in this article, TC-99m which has the same adhesion properties as uranium compounds but is less radioactive was used for safety purposes. As far as the adhesion properties are concerned, Vanderwall forces play an important role and prevent particles bigger than 100 mm in size to be removed by using a simple extraction system. Laser cleaning is advantageous because it removes surface layers as well as sub-micron particles.
Allied Scientific Pro, offers laser cleaning systems of 100 Watt, 200 Watt and 500 watt based on fiber laser systems. The following link contains more information about these systems.
1- Laser removal of loose uranium compound contamination from metal surfaces, D.E.Roberts, et.al, applied surface science, 253, (2007)
2- Pebble-bed nuclear reactor gets pulled, Linda Nording, Nature 463, 2010.
3- Methodology for volume reduction of radioactive metallic waste, T.V.Do et. al, WM2019 conference, Phoenix, Arizona.